TEXAS SUPREME COURT
ORDERS FEBRUARY 2009
(orders without opinions)

RECENT ORDERS ISSUED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
April 2008 Orders | May 2008 Orders | June 2008 Orders | July 2008 Orders |
August 2008 Orders | September 2008 Orders | October 2008 Orders | November 2008 Orders |  
December 2008 Orders | Petitions denied January 2009 |

Please note that there are separate pages for
Orders Granting Petitions, Orders Denying Petitions for Review,
and for
Texas Supreme Court Opinions  

Orders Pronounced February 13, 2009

THE MOTIONS FOR REHEARING OF THE FOLLOWING CAUSES ARE DENIED:

06‑0097  GILBERT KERLIN, INDIVIDUALLY, GILBERT KERLIN, TRUSTEE, WINDWARD OIL & GAS
CORP., AND PI CORP v. GLORIA SOTO ARIAS, ET AL.; from Cameron County; 13th district
(13‑03‑00364‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01‑05‑06)

08‑0524  IN RE DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY & PROTECTIVE SERVICES; from Harris County; 1st district
(01‑08‑00348‑CV, 265 SW3d 545, 06‑30‑08)
stay order issued July 3, 2008, as reinstated, lifted

ORDERS ON CASES GRANTED

THE FOLLOWING DISCIPLINARY APPEAL IS SET FOR ORAL ARGUMENT:

08‑0705  BOMA O. ALLISON v. COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE
[Note: This case has been set for oral argument at 9:00 a.m., March 11, 2009.]
Time allotted to argue: 20/20 minutes

THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE GRANTED:

07‑0205  WAFFLE HOUSE, INC. v. CATHIE WILLIAMS; from Tarrant County; 2nd district
(02‑05‑00373‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 02‑01‑07)
[Note: This case has been set for oral argument at 9:00 a.m., March 12, 2009.]
Time allotted to argue: 20/20 minutes

07‑0815  INTERCONTINENTAL GROUP PARTNERSHIP v. KB HOME LONE STAR L.P.; from Hidalgo
County; 13th district (13‑06‑00617‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08‑23‑07)  
[Note: This case has been set for oral argument at 9:00 a.m., March 12, 2009.]
Time allotted to argue: 20/20 minutes

08‑0043  TIMPTE INDUSTRIES, INC. AND TIMPTE, INC. v. ROBERT GISH AND PINNACOL
ASSURANCE; from Hale County; 7th district (07‑06‑00215‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 11‑30‑07)
[Note: This case has been set for oral argument at 9:00 a.m., March 11, 2009.]
Time allotted to argue: 20/20 minutes

08‑0175  WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION v. MARGARITA CAMACHO, ET AL.; from Hidalgo County; 13th
district (13‑05‑00361‑CV, 251 SW3d 88, 01‑17‑08)
[Note: Oral argument of this case will be conducted on Tuesday, March 10, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. at South
Texas College of Law, Houston, Texas. See Tex. Const. art. V, § 3(a).]
Time allotted to argue: 20/20 minutes
(Justice O'Neill not sitting)

08‑0262  ROY KENJI YAMADA, M.D. v. LAURA FRIEND, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF SARAH ELIZABETH FRIEND, DECEASED, AND LUTHER
FRIEND, INDIVIDUALLY; from Tarrant County; 2nd district (02‑07‑00177‑CV, ___ SW3d ___,
02‑28‑08)  
[Note: Oral argument of this case will be conducted on Tuesday, March 10, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. at South
Texas College of Law, Houston, Texas. See Tex. Const. art. V, § 3(a).]
Time allotted to argue: 20/20 minutes

08‑0363  STATE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT v. MARY LAWTON; from Brazos County; 10th
district (10‑07‑00072‑CV, 256 SW3d 436, 04‑16‑08)
[Note: This case has been set for oral argument at 9:00 a.m., March 11, 2009.]
Time allotted to argue: 20/20 minutes

08‑0390  MBM FINANCIAL CORPORATION N/K/A MBM FINANCIAL INTERESTS, L.P. AND MARIMON
BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. v. THE WOODLANDS OPERATING COMPANY, L.P.; from Montgomery
County; 9th district (09‑07‑00060‑CV, 251 SW3d 174, 04‑10‑08)
[Note: This case has been set for oral argument at 9:00 a.m., March 12, 2009.]
Time allotted to argue: 20/20 minutes
(Justice O'Neill not sitting)

THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS SET FOR ORAL ARGUMENT:

08‑0836  IN RE WEEKLEY HOMES, L.P.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05‑08‑01249‑CV, ___ SW3d
___, 09‑24‑08)
[Note: This case has been set for oral argument at 9:00 a.m., March 31, 2009.]
Time allotted to argue: 20/20 minutes

ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR REVIEW IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION:

08‑1016  VERONICA ELWELL v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC. F/B/O WARBURG REAL
ESTATE SECURITIES, INC.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05‑07‑01753‑CV, 267 SW3d 566,
10‑15‑08)

ORDERS ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING

THE MOTIONS FOR REHEARING OF THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE DENIED:

07‑0992  GRIFFIN, L.L.C. v. ADOBE LAND CORPORATION, ADOBE CATTLE COMPANY (A GENERAL
PARTNERSHIP), CHERRY CREEK FARMS (A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP), VANGUARD AG SERVICES,
INC., AND ADOBE IRRIGATION AND AG SERVICES, L.L.C.; from Tarrant County; 2nd district
(02‑06‑00097‑CV, 236 SW3d 351, 07‑12‑07)

08‑0178  IN THE INTEREST OF C.A.M.M., A MINOR CHILD; from Harris County; 14th district
(14‑06‑00279‑CV, 243 SW3d 211, 10‑30‑07)

08‑0552  CARRIE COOPER, M.D. v. RAUL ARIZPE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ALVERA D. ARIZPE,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GUARDIAN OF LINDA DIANE ARIZPE; from Bexar County; 4th district
(04‑07‑00734‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 04‑09‑08)

08‑0567  BRUCE WAYNE HOUSER v. KENNY K. ALLEN, ET AL.; from Jefferson County; 9th district
(09‑07‑00106‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 05‑15‑08)

MISCELLANEOUS

THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ARE DENIED:

08‑0976  IN RE ELVERA M. JOHNSON, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT CLERK OF
PARKER COUNTY, TEXAS; from Parker County; 2nd district (02‑08‑00063‑CV, ___ SW3d ___,
04‑18‑08)

08‑1025  IN RE AXEL MICHAEL SIGMAR; from Walker County; 10th district (10‑08‑00328‑CV, 270
SW3d 289, 11‑05‑08)

08‑1084  IN RE LAURANCE KRIEGEL; from Parmer County; 7th district (07‑08‑00391‑CV, ___ SW3d
___, 10‑31‑08)

08‑1085  IN RE LAURANCE KRIEGEL; from Parmer County

09‑0017  IN RE EDDIE EDINGTON; from Shackelford County; 2nd district (02‑08‑00415‑CV, ___ SW3d
___, 11‑26‑08)
motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and request for sanctions denied

09‑0018  IN RE JOSE LUIS PENA; from Cameron County; 13th district (13‑94‑00303‑CV, ___ SW3d
___, 03‑20‑97)

09‑0074  IN RE JOHN THOMAS IZZO; from Williamson County; 3rd district (03‑08‑00740‑CV, ___
SW3d ___, 01‑08‑09)
motion for temporary relief denied

Orders Pronounced February 6, 2009

THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE STRUCK PURSUANT TO TEXAS RULE OF
APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.4(i):

09‑0008  JAMES AND DOROTHY ADAMS v. WMC MORTGAGE CORP., EMMANUEL D. GAINES AND
DARRELL TURNER; from Harris County; 14th district (14‑06‑00671‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 07‑03‑08)
The Court strikes the petition for review with the following notation: "The petition violates Texas Rules
of Appellate Procedure 53.6 and is struck. Petitioner is ordered to redraw; the redrawn petition is due
to be filed February 17, 2009."

09‑0095  CINDY SCHLAPPER v. RAND FOREST, BUCK CHILDERS, ROBERT LEONARD STEWART
D/B/A ROBERT LEONARD, MIKE KEUHL, SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT, FLAGSHIP MARINE,
DOROTHY STEWART UZZELL, BETTY STEWART HANSON; from Travis County; 3rd district
(03‑06‑00315‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 11‑07‑08)
The Court strikes the petition for review with the following notation: "The petition violates Texas Rules
of Appellate Procedure 9.4(c), (d) and 53.6 and is struck. Petitioner is ordered to redraw; the redrawn
petition is due to be filed February 17, 2009."

ORDERS ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING

THE MOTIONS FOR REHEARING OF THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE DENIED:

08‑0396  CITY OF DALLAS v. KEISHA HEARD, ET AL.; from Dallas County; 5th district
(05‑07‑00762‑CV, 252 SW3d 98, 04‑22‑08)

08‑0691  ESTATE OF CHARLEY G. MARTIN, DECEASED, ALICE LONGFELLOW, INDEPENDENT
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE v. RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC. AND WALMART STORES EAST,
INC.; from Tarrant County; 2nd district (02‑06‑00124‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 06‑12‑08)

MISCELLANEOUS

THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ARE ABATED:

08‑0977  IN RE RUBEN S. MARTIN III; from Harris County; 1st district (01‑08‑00782‑CV, ___ SW3d
___, 11‑14‑08) abatement order issued  
[Note: The case is abated under Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(b) for thirty days.]

09‑0051  IN RE MILTON M. SMITH; from Dallas County; 5th district (05‑08‑01150‑CV, ___ SW3d ___,
09‑12‑08) abatement order issued

[Note: Effective as of January 30, 2009, the case is abated pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 8.2 until further
order of this Court and is removed from the Court's active docket, subject to reinstatement upon
proper motion. Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. All motions and other documents pending or filed are abated
subject to being reurged in the event the case is reinstated. Tex. R. App. P. 8.2 and 8.3. It is the
parties' responsibility to immediately notify this Court once the automatic bankruptcy stay is lifted.]

THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ARE DENIED:

08‑1086  IN RE BILLY HOLMES A/K/A BILLY RIHCARDS; from Bee County; 13th district
(13‑08‑00578‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 10‑09‑08)

09‑0056  IN RE PAUL JAMES KOUMJIAN; from Walker County; 10th district
motion for leave to file interlocutory appeal, being treated as a petition for writ of mandamus, denied
emergency motion for relief denied
motion for access to photocopier denied
motion to forward record denied
LINKS FOR TEX. SUP. CT. ACTIVITY
2009 Texas Supreme Court Opinions
Petitions Denied January 2009
Petitions Granted 2009
Other 2009 Texas Supreme Court Orders
Texas Supreme Court Opinions 2008
Tex. Sup. Ct Opinions Jan-June 2008
Tex 2008 Mandamus Opinions
Per Curiam Opinions (Tex. 2008)
Per Curiam Jan-Jun 2008
Texas Supreme Court Orders 2008
Petitions for Review Denied 2008
Petitions Granted in 2008
SUPREME COURT RULINGS
BY LAW SUIT TYPE
PRACTICE AREA
Tex 2008 Opinions by Category (Index)
Medical MalpractIce Decisions
Consumer Law and Class Actions
Supreme Court Family Law Decisions
JUDICIAL POLITICS PAGES
2008 Judicial Election Campaigns
TEXAS OPINIONS HOME PAGE
TEXAS CASE LAW PAGES
law-ADR-family-law  
law-ADR  
law-DJA-declaratory-judgment
law-DSA  
law-DWOJ-dismissal-for-want-of-jurisdiction
law-DWOP-dismissal
law-HCLC
law-IIED-intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distres
s  
law-ILA
law-JNOV  
law-PI-auto-accidents-negligence  
law-Rule-11-TRCP-11
law-TTCA   
law-WBA  
law-abstract-questions-of-law  
law-account stated
law-adverse-possession  
law-advisory opinion  
law-age-discrimination  
law-animals
law-annexation
law-arbitration  
law-asbestos litigation
law-attorney-client-disputes  
law-attorneys-fees  
law-breach-of-contract  
law-breach-of-fiduciary-duty  
law-breach-of-warranty  
law-capacity
law-certified questions
law-child-support  
law-choice-of-law
law-citation  
law-civil-commitment  
law-civil-conspiracy  
law-class-actions  
law-condemnation  
law-construction  
law-consumer-law  
law-contempt  
law-contract  
law-credit-card-debt-suit  
law-declaratory-judgment
law-deed
law-deed-restrictions-restrictive-covenants  
law-deemed-admissions  
law-defamation-credit
law-defamation-libel-slander   
law-default-judgment  
law-discovery-disputes
law-discovery-presuit
law-discovery-rule
law-divorce-property-division
law-domestication-enforcement-of-foreign-judgm
ent
law-drivers-license-suspension-DUI-DWI
law-duress-undue-influence  
law-easement   
law-election-law
law-employment-at-will   
law-employment
law-estoppel
law-execution-enforcement-of-judgment  
law-exhaustion-of-administrative-remedies  
law-expunction
law-family-law-international
law-family-law
law-federal-preemption   
law-fire-insurance-liability  
law-food-restaurant-hospitality
law-foreclosure  
law-forfeiture  
law-foreign law
law-forum-selection   
law-fracturing-of-claims
law-fraudulent-concealment-tolling
law-fraudulent inducement
law-governmental-entities-local
law-governmental-entities-state-agencies
law-governmental-immunity  
law-gross-negligence
law-hearsay-objection
law-home-equity-loans
law-home-owner
law-homestead
law-indemnity-indemnify-indemnification  
law-individual-capacity
law-ineffective-assistance-of-counsel  
law-informed-consent
law-insurance-business-regulation
law-insurance-coverage-disputes
law-insurance-duty-to-defend-indemnify
law-insurance-life  
law-intervention
law-judicial-admission  
law-judicial-notice  
law-judicial-notice-of-foreign-law
law-jury-error  
law-jury-selection  
law-juveniles  
law-leases  
law-lien  
law-limitations  
law-malpractice-legal  
law-malpractice-medical
law-money-had-and-received  
law-mootness-doctrine  
law-motion-for-continuance  
law-motion-for-new-trial  
law-motion for rehearing   
law-motion-to-reinstate  
law-motion-to-show-authority
law-negligence  
law-negligent-entrustment  
law-nonsuit  
law-nuisance
law-official-capacity  
law-official-immunity-defense   
law-oil-and-gas-and-minerals   
law-parental-rights  
law-parole-evidence-rule  
law-partition-of-land   
law-partnership disputes  
law-permanent-injunction
law-plenary-power
law-post-divorce-actions  
law-preemption-federal
law-premises-liability
law-prisoner-death
law-prisoner-suits
law-pro-se-suits  
law-probate
law-product-liability  
law-promissory-note  
law-property-taxes  
law-public-employment
law-ratification  
law-recusal
law-reinstatement
law-religion
law-res-judicata-doctrine
law-residential-construction
law-restricted-appeal
law-retaliation  
law-retroactive-application
law-ripeness-doctrine  
law-sales-tax  
law-sanctions  
law-sovereign-immunity  
law-special-appearance  
law-special exception
law-specific-performance
law-standing-doctrine  
law-statutory-construction
law-takings-claim-inverse-condemnation  
law-temporary-orders-TRO  
law-termination-of-parental-rights  
law-test-for-abuse-of-discretion   
law-tortious-interference  
law-trade-secret
law-trade-secrets  
law-turnover-order
law-unauthorized-practice-of-law-UPLC
law-unfair-competition  
law-unliquidated-damages
law-venue  
law-vex-lit  
law-voluntary-underemployment   
law-waiver  
law-water  
law-workers-comp  
law-workplace-injury  
plenary-power