Signed Opinions Delivered Jan-June 2008
OPINIONS
OF THE COURT
DISSENTS
& CONCURS
TOTAL
OPINIONS
JUSTICES FACING RE-ELECTION IN 2008
     
Justice Dale Wainwright
5
3
8
Chief Justice Jefferson
3
4
7
Justice Phil Johnson
2
4
6
JUSTICES NOT FACING RE-ELECTION IN 2008
     
Justice Harriet O'Neill
7
8
15
Justice Scott A. Brister
9
2
11
Justice Don R. Willett
4
7
11
Justice Nathan Hecht
4
5
9
Justice Paul Green
5
3
8
Justice David Medina
6
0
6
TOTALS FOR THE COURT
45
36
81
SIGNED TEX. SUP. CT. OPINIONS JAN - JUNE 2008
Updated Aug. 25, 2008
2008 Texas Supreme Court Opinion Production | Opinions on the Web
THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT'S
OPINION PRODUC
TION
The table below shows the number of signed opinions released by the Court between
January 1, 2008 and June 30, 2008, broken down by authoring justice and type
of opinion. The authorship of
per curiam opinions is not known, and they are not
included here. Justices' names are hyper-linked to pages listing their opinions in
reverse chronological order.
Signed Opinions Delivered FY
2007-2008
SIGNED
MAJORITY
OPINIONS
OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM
OPINIONS
DISSENTS
& CONCURS
OTHER
OPINONS
TOTAL
OPINIONS
JUSTICES FACING RE-ELECTION IN 2008
         
Justice Dale Wainwright
9
4
4
1
18
Chief Justice Jefferson
10
4
7
0
21
Justice Phil Johnson
6
3
7
6
22
JUSTICES NOT FACING RE-ELECTION IN
2008
         
Justice Harriet O'Neill
12
9
10
1
32
Justice Scott A. Brister
11
18
9
0
38
Justice Don R. Willett
8
0
13
0
21
Justice Nathan Hecht
5
5
8
3
21
Justice Paul Green
8
9
4
1
22
Justice David Medina
6
8
0
2
16
Judge sitting by assignment
1
      1
TOTALS FOR THE COURT
76
60
62
14
212
The table below shows number of opinions (broken down by type) for the entire 2007-2008 Fiscal Year.
Source: Texas Supreme Court Clerk's Office as reported by the TEXAS LAWYER, Sep. 15, 2008, p. 12;
Concurring, dissenting, and partially concurring/dissenting opinions were collapsed into one category.
TEXAS SUPREME COURT SIGNED AND PER CURIAM OPINIONS
FISCAL YEAR 2007-08
JUDGE MARK DAVIDSON'S ELECTION CAMPAIGN SIGN AND SLOGAN (WITH PHOTO)
A judicial campaign slogan that may not befit all
re-election candidates on the Supreme Court
Do judicial re-election
campaigns undermine
productivity?